ARE THEY ‘HONOURABLE’ MEMBERS?

ARE THEY ‘HONOURABLE’ MEMBERS?

 

Will the Honourable Members:

  • Littleproud
  • McCormack
  • Hartsuyker
  • Gillespie
  • Drum
  • Christensen
  • Coultron
  • Hogan
  • Landry
  • Broad
  • O’Dowd
  • O’Brien
  • Pitt
  • Chester
  • Gee

And Senators:

  • McKenzie
  • Scullion
  • Canavan
  • O’Sullivan
  • Williams

heed the great general’s advice?

OR

Will the National Party go the way of the Labor and Liberal Parties  and cause the extinction of this rare species of Virtue, LOYALTY, in Federal Politics?

Gibber! Gibber!

Chugley,

The Law of The Jungle Observing Chimpanzee Who Enjoys His ‘Julius Caesar’ by William Shakespeare.

P.S. Didn’t General Monash have a dual household as well?

2 thoughts on “ARE THEY ‘HONOURABLE’ MEMBERS?”

  1. Ahh! the Machiavellian mechanations of our political representatives. Mud slinging from one side to the other. People in glass houses should not throw stones. The tables will turn.

    It seems to me that the primary purpose of parliament this session is not matters of state, the economy or the well being of the population. But rather trivial matters involving peoples private lives.

    One would hope for better BUT, we are getting the government that we elected.

    Chugley, are you considering your options?

    1. Yes, I am staying in my zoo thanks! I also believe you did NOT elect this PM, but this PM booted the one you did elect, with dreadful consequences! Gibber! Gibber! I shall be voting for Cory Bernardi…

Comments are closed.

Comments are closed.