‘THE MYTH OF APE-TO-HUMAN EVOLUTION’ – Peter Line

‘THE MYTH OF APE-TO-HUMAN EVOLUTION’ – Peter Line

The above email (Link below) arrived from Creation.com this morning. It explores the question of humans and chimpanzees having a common ancestor. Although it has been published previously, I found the comments at the end – which are new to me- particularly helpful. In fact I was rocketed into “Search-For-The-Truth” overdrive mode.

I can only conclude that I am somehow a one-off Chimp who has had some extra human DNA grafted into my system from an unknown source.

A look around the zoo shows no evidence of other animals developing human skills – other than the parrots talking as usual. Something I can’t do! Funny that, isn’t it?

Gibber! Gibber!

Chugley,

The ‘Mythical’ Evolving Thinking Chimpanzee

P.S. A reminder! Subscription to my blog is free.

 

https://creation.com/ape-to-human-evolution?utm_campaign=infobytes_au&utm_content=Why+ape-to-human+evolution+is+hopelessly+implausible&utm_medium=email&utm_source=mailing.creation.com&utm_term=Fortnightly+Digest+-+2018.11.23

 

Categories

Format

Post Formats

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Tags

Separate tags with commas

Featured Image

Set featured image

Slug

Sharing

All in One SEO PackHelp

| Chugley’s Chatter

https://chugley.blog/?p=4954

 


 characters. Most search engines use a maximum of 60 chars for the title.


 characters. Most search engines use a maximum of 160 chars for the description.
Link inserted.

liked the comment “Being popular doesn’t make an idea scientifically plausible”.

https://creation.com/ape-to-human-evolution?utm_campaign=infobytes_au&utm_content=Why+ape-to-human+evolution+is+hopelessly+implausible&utm_medium=email&utm_source=mailing.creation.com&utm_term=Fortnightly+Digest+-+2018.11.23

Gibber! Gibber!

Chugley

 

2 thoughts on “‘THE MYTH OF APE-TO-HUMAN EVOLUTION’ – Peter Line”

  1. Those wonderfully detailed, orderly and complex interplay of nucleotides in our DNA are confounding the evolutionists, eh? The mathematical probabilities of human/chimp relationships don’t augur well for future evolutionary theory, it would seem from this Creation article.
    I would be interested to read what evolutionary scientists think of this apparent impossibly huge mathematical probability obstacle.

    1. It makes it very hard for this Chimp, because people won’t really engage in using their faculties to assess the creation/evolution debate in depth. They seem to fall for any opinion that makes out to be “scientific” and opposes Creation or the possibility of a God in the equation. It seems ’twas ever thus Paul! A fallen world surrounds us all. Gibber! Gibber! Chugley

Comments are closed.

Comments are closed.